Kajian Penataan Jalur Pedestrian sebagai Unsur Fisik Pembentuk Karakter Visual dan Aktivitas Penggunjung

Studi Kasus : Gerbang Selamat Datang Simpang Kepur Kota Muara Enim

Authors

  • Mita Hargianti Universitas Serasan
  • Rika Septiana Universitas Serasan
  • Asia Afriani Universitas Serasan
  • Husnul Hidayat Universitas Sriwijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/konstruksi.v4i1.1266

Keywords:

Activity, Character, Pedestrian, Urban, Visual

Abstract

Pedestrian is one of the most important public spaces for urban areas. On the border of Muara Enim city has a pedestrian that attracts attention, namely the pedestrian welcome intersection kepur. Simpang Kepur pedestrian has a border gate that is the center of attention and the first impression when entering the city of Muara Enim so that it has the opportunity as a face or symbol of the identity of the city of Muara Enim. Visually, the existence of pedestrians and gates at the Kepur intersection looks quite attractive but functionally it is not in accordance with the characteristics of pedestrian activities on the pedestrian so that research is needed to rearrange the previous design so that the function of the pedestrian becomes even better. The method used is qualitative through observation based on facts and activities in the field. Analysis based on the impression of place and activity on the pedestrian. The results obtained that there is a need to change the appearance of the color processing so that the pedestrian becomes more alive, need to keep the pedestrian so that there is no loss or damage, the need for guardrails or vegetation / view barrier plants in the area behind or beside the pedestrian, rearrangement of plants that can absorb dust and can absorb noise, and arrangement of street furniture, namely visual recommendations for a wider bus stop design, replace permanent seating, replace permanent trash.

References

Adi, H. P., Nahdatunnisa, Heikoop, R., & Wahyudi, S. I. (2024). Enhancing Inclusivity: Designing Disability Friendly Pedestrian Pathways. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, 14(3), 691–699. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsse.140303

Anggriani. N. (2011). Ruang Terbuka Hijau Di Perkotaan (1st ed.). Klaten: Yayasan Humaniora.

Ardhanajaya, H. P., & Rambe, Y. S. (2025). Evaluasi Fungsi Pedestrian di Kesawan dalam Mendukung Kawasan Heritage Kota Medan. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism Research, 8(2), 534–547. https://doi.org/10.31289/jaur.v8i2.14606

Ayuningtias, A., Hadi, W., Studi, P., Teknik, P., Fakultas, B., Universitas, T., & Jakarta, N. (2025). Analisis Kesesuaian Pembangunan Jalur Pedestrian di Jl . H . R . Rasuna Said ( Sisi Barat ) Pasca Revitalisasi Berdasarkan Permen PU No . 07 / P / BM / 2023, 1(5), 2854–2868.

Bupati Muara Enim. (2018). Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Muara Enim Nomor 13 TAHUN 2018 018.

Hargianti, M., Septiana, R., Iskandar, Y., Nasution, & Insani, W. (2025). Identifikasi Street Furniture dari Perspektif Penggunaan Material, Studi kasus: Taman di wilayah perkotaan Muara Enim. Jurnal Lingkungan Binaan Indonesia, 14(1), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.32315/jlbi.v14i1.444

Islami, N. A., Wulandari, A., & Kapuas, K. (2023). IDENTIFIKASI KONDISI JALUR PEDESTRIAN DI KAWASAN.

Jialu Zhou, & Ujang, N. (2024). An Analysis of Pedestrian Preferences for Wayfinding Signage in Urban Settings: Evidence from Nanning, China.

Joenso, R. C., Purwanto, E., & Wijayanti, W. (2022). Jalur Pedestrian Sebagai Unsur Fisik Pembentuk Karakter Visual Koridor Jalan Diponegoro Salatiga. Jurnal Arsitektur ARCADE, 6(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.31848/arcade.v6i1.696

Kementrian Lingkungan Hidup dan kehutanan. (2015). Juknis Penanaman Spesies Pohon Penyerap Polutan Udara. 2015.

Marihot, Y., Sari, S., & Endang, A. (2022). Buku Metode Penelitian Kualitatif & Kuantitatif. Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani (MUDIMA) (Vol. 1).

Maulana, K. A., Sriharyani, L., & Kurniawan, S. (2024). Kenyamanan Pejalan Kaki Terhadap Pemanfaatan Trotoar. JUMATISI, 5(1).

Pereira, M. F., Santana, P., & Vale, D. S. (2024). The Impact of Urban Design on Utilitarian and Leisure Walking—The Relative Influence of Street Network Connectivity and Streetscape Features. Urban Science, 8(2), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci8020024

Putri, L. R., Kusumastuti, K., & Soedwiwahjono, S. (2024). Penilaian Tingkat Walkability Jalur Pedestrian di Kawasan Wisata Pusat Kota Bogor. Desa-Kota, 6(1), 84. https://doi.org/10.20961/desa-kota.v6i1.77704.84-100

Rustam Hakim, H. U. (2004). Komponen Perancangan Arsitektur Lansekap. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Sadeghi, O., & Di Marzo Serugendo, G. (2024, December 9). Assessing Walkability in Urban Environments: A Comprehensive Overview. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202412.0689.v1

Satria, W. D., Asriana, N., Nurzukhrufa, A., Koamuna, J., Christhover, B., & Prasetyo, A. (2024). International Journal of Architecture and Urbanism Study of Pedestrian Path Comfort Evaluation in Campus Environment of Institut Teknologi Sumatera, 08(02), 164–173.

Shirvani, H. (1985). The Urban Design Process. Newyork: VNR Company.

Suminar, L., & Kusumaningrum, L. (2022). Application of Walkability Principles of Pedestrian Path in Supporting the Green City Concept, 18(02), 2–11.

Wardiana, I. Y., Kusuma, H. E., & Rahmawati, P. A. (2024). Pengaruh Karakteristik Jalur Pedestrian di Indonesia terhadap Penilaian Walkability The Influence of Pedestrian Path Characteristics in Indonesia on Walkability Assessment, 13(10).

Widiyanti. (2022). Analisa Aspek Kenyamanan Pada Jalur Pedestrian (Studi kasus : Jalan DI. Panjaitan dan Jalan Jatinegara Timur, Kecamatan Jatinegara). Jurnal Ilmiah Arjouna Vol 4, No. 2, Jakarta 2022, 4(2), 1–13. Retrieved from https://journal.teknikunkris.ac.id/index.php/arjuna/article/download/239/221

Downloads

Published

2026-01-28

How to Cite

Mita Hargianti, Rika Septiana, Asia Afriani, & Husnul Hidayat. (2026). Kajian Penataan Jalur Pedestrian sebagai Unsur Fisik Pembentuk Karakter Visual dan Aktivitas Penggunjung: Studi Kasus : Gerbang Selamat Datang Simpang Kepur Kota Muara Enim. Konstruksi: Publikasi Ilmu Teknik, Perencanaan Tata Ruang Dan Teknik Sipil, 4(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.61132/konstruksi.v4i1.1266