Evaluasi Efisiensi Arus Lalu Lintas Menggunakan Analisis Statistik Deskriptif dan Uji Wilcoxon pada Jalan Otto Iskandar

Beny Rafli Nurcahyo; Amri Gunasti

doi:10.61132/venus.v3i6.1253

Authors

Beny Rafli Nurcahyo Universitas Muhammadiyyah Jember
Amri Gunasti Universitas Muhammadiyyah Jember

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/venus.v3i6.1253

Keywords:

Road Capacity, Traffic Performance, Travel Duration, Vehicle Volume, Wilcoxon Test

Abstract

Traffic performance on urban road segments is strongly affected by vehicle volume and travel time, particularly during peak periods. This study analyzes the relationship between travel duration and the total number of vehicles passing along Otto Iskandar Road as an illustration of urban traffic conditions. Data were collected through field surveys, focusing on two main variables: average vehicle travel time and total traffic volume. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics, including normality testing and the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test to identify potential differences between the observed variables. The results show a difference in average values between travel duration and vehicle volume; however, this difference is not statistically significant at the 95% confidence level (p = 0.180). These findings indicate that increases in traffic volume do not always lead to proportional increases in travel time, although they can still influence the stability and efficiency of traffic flow. The results are consistent with previous studies, such as Halim (2021), who reported that U-turn movements affect speed and traffic performance, and Handayani et al. (2024), who found that parking activities and vehicle maneuvers reduce road capacity. Other studies also highlight the impact of side friction and traffic flow variations on speed and saturation levels. Overall, this study emphasizes the importance of managing vehicle flow and monitoring travel time in urban transportation planning and traffic management.

References

Conover, W. J. (1999). Practical nonparametric statistics (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Downs, A. (2004). Still stuck in traffic: Coping with peak-hour traffic congestion. Brookings Institution Press.

Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Halim, S. H. (2021). Kajian putar balik (U-turn) terhadap kinerja arus lalu lintas (studi kasus Jl. Ibrahim Adjie Kota Bandung). Jurnal Media Teknologi, 7(2), 109–115. https://doi.org/10.25157/jmt.v7i2.2638

Handayani, M. P., Hotter, R., Fadhli, A., & Wahyuni, S. (2024). Pengaruh manuver parkir kendaraan pada ruas Jalan Jenderal Sudirman Kota Solok terhadap arus lalu lintas. Journal of Scientech Research and Development, 6(1), 552–562. https://doi.org/10.56670/jsrd.v6i1.384

Levine, D. M., Stephan, D. F., Szabat, K. A., & Berenson, M. L. (2017). Statistics for managers using Microsoft Excel (8th ed.). Pearson Education.

May, A. D. (1990). Traffic flow fundamentals. Prentice Hall.

Ortúzar, J. de D., & Willumsen, L. G. (2011). Modelling transport (4th ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119993308

Pratina, G., Musthofiah, A. H. M., & Legowo, S. J. (2018). Variasi waktu keberangkatan arus kendaraan pada simpang bersinyal dengan countdown timer. Jurnal Matriks Teknik Sipil, 565–569.

Rodrigue, J. P., Comtois, C., & Slack, B. (2020). The geography of transport systems (5th ed.). Routledge.

Sriharyani, L., & Hidayat, M. N. (2017). Analisis arus kendaraan terhadap kinerja simpang tak bersinyal dengan metode PKJI 2014. Jurnal TAPAK, 6(2), 134–139.

Tamin, O. Z. (2000). Perencanaan dan pemodelan transportasi. Penerbit ITB.

Taylor, M. A. P. (2002). Travel demand modelling: Past, present and future. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 36(6), 431–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(01)00029-1

Transportation Research Board. (2016). Highway capacity manual (6th ed.). National Academies Press.

Yermadona, H., & Meilisa, M. (2020). Pengaruh aktivitas pasar terhadap arus lalu lintas (studi kasus Pasar Baso Kabupaten Agam). Rang Teknik Journal, 3(1), 75–80.