Kriteria Pemilihan Tapak pada Perancangan Sport Science Center di Surabaya

Faramayla Adinda Rinaldy; Andarita Rolalisasi; Febby Rahmatullah Masruchin

doi:10.61132/konstruksi.v4i2.1353

Authors

Faramayla Adinda Rinaldy Universitas 17 Agustus 1945
Andarita Rolalisasi Universitas 17 Agustus 1945
Febby Rahmatullah Masruchin Universitas 17 Agustus 1945

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/konstruksi.v4i2.1353

Keywords:

Design Criteria, Site Selection, Sport Science Center, Sports Development, Surabaya City

Abstract

Surabaya is one of the metropolitan cities in Indonesia with significant potential for the development of sports performance and the improvement of public health quality. The advancement of modern sports requires a sport science–based approach that integrates training, health, technology, and research aspects. However, the lack of integrated sport science facilities remains a major challenge. Therefore, proper site selection is a crucial factor in the design of a Sport Science Center. This study aims to formulate appropriate site selection criteria for the design of a Sport Science Center in Surabaya. The research method used is descriptive qualitative, employing literature studies, site observations, and comparative analysis of alternative sites based on predetermined criteria. The results indicate that the main site selection criteria include accessibility, proximity to supporting facilities, compliance with spatial planning regulations, environmental conditions, land area, and future development potential. Based on the analysis, the Middle East Ring Road (MERR) area in Surabaya is considered the most suitable location for the development of a Sport Science Center.

References

Brogden, R. (1979). Site planning and design handbook. McGraw-Hill.

Carr, S., Francis, M., Rivlin, L., & Stone, A. (1992). Public space. Cambridge University Press.

Ching, F. D. K. (2014). Architecture: Form, space, and order. Wiley.

Fadilah, R., Putra, A., & Santoso, B. (2022). Integrating sport science into athlete development in Indonesia. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 22(4), 1050–1058.

Frick, H., & Suskiyatno, B. (2007). Dasar-dasar arsitektur ekologis. Kanisius.

Gehl, J. (2011). Life between buildings: Using public space. Island Press.

Kementerian Pemuda dan Olahraga Republik Indonesia. (2022). Desain besar olahraga nasional (DBON). Kementerian Pemuda dan Olahraga RI.

Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi. (2017). Rencana induk riset nasional (RIRN) 2017–2045. Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi.

Kusuma, A., & Prasetyo, D. (2020). Perancangan gedung olahraga multifungsi dengan pendekatan arsitektur adaptif di Surabaya. Jurnal Arsitektur ITS, 9(2), 45–54.

Neufert, E. (2012). Architects’ data (4th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

Pemerintah Kota Surabaya. (2025). Peraturan daerah Kota Surabaya Nomor 8 Tahun 2025 tentang rencana pembangunan jangka menengah daerah (RPJMD) Kota Surabaya Tahun 2025–2029. Pemerintah Kota Surabaya.

Rukayah. (2020). Analisis pemilihan tapak dalam perancangan arsitektur berbasis lingkungan. Jurnal Arsitektur Nusantara, 5(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.31848/arcade.v5i1.632

UNESCO. (2015). Quality physical education (QPE) guidelines for policy makers. UNESCO Publishing.

Wahyudi, S., & Rahayu, L. (2023). Development of sport science center as a facility for athlete training and research in Indonesia. Universitas Airlangga Journal of Human Movement, 5(1), 12–21.

Yeang, K. (2006). EcoDesign: A manual for ecological design. Wiley-Academy.