Integrasi Green Architecture dalam Rancangan Pusat Pendidikan dan Simulasi Bencana di Kawasan Tropis

Nabila Nur Mustafa; Zuhriati A. Djailani; Niniek Pratiwi

doi:10.61132/konstruksi.v3i3.993

Authors

Nabila Nur Mustafa Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Zuhriati A. Djailani Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Niniek Pratiwi Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/konstruksi.v3i3.993

Keywords:

Disaster Simulation, Eco-Friendly, Education Center, Green Architecture, Tropical Area

Abstract

Gorontalo Province is an area with a high level of disaster vulnerability, both from hydrometeorological disasters such as floods and landslides, as well as geological disasters such as earthquakes. This condition requires an integrated, modern, and sustainable disaster training facility. Unfortunately, until now Gorontalo does not have a representative disaster management education and training center to support community preparedness. This research aims to design a Disaster Management Education and Training Center that not only functions as an education and simulation place, but also integrates green architecture principles to create an environmentally friendly and energy-efficient learning environment. The method used is qualitative descriptive with primary data collection through observation, interviews with stakeholders, and field documentation. Secondary data were obtained from literature studies, disaster architectural precedents, and spatial planning regulatory studies. The design site was chosen in Limboto District with considerations of accessibility, development potential, and geographical conditions. Analysis is carried out on spatial, functional, and climatological aspects to produce an optimal zoning concept and the orientation of building masses according to the tropical climate. The design results show that an area of 19,371 m² can accommodate all space needs with the utilization of KDB of 25.4%. The application of green architecture is realized through the use of environmentally friendly local materials, natural lighting, cross ventilation, solar panels, and rainwater management systems. The simulation facilities for floods, landslides, earthquakes, and fires are designed based on experiential learning so that participants can experience disaster scenarios firsthand. This design is expected to be a model of sustainable tropical disaster architecture, replicate in other disaster-prone areas, and encourage the creation of a disaster-aware culture. This research also opens up further research opportunities related to energy performance evaluation and the application of digital technology in disaster education.

References

Akbari, H., Levinson, R., & Konopacki, S. (2008). Monitoring the performance of cool roofs in the California climate. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Alexander, D. (2002). Principles of emergency planning and management. Oxford University Press.

BPBD Gorontalo. (2024). Laporan kejadian bencana Provinsi Gorontalo 2018–2023. Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah Provinsi Gorontalo.

Cahyani, R. (2018). Efisiensi energi pada gedung perpustakaan UI sebagai bangunan hijau. Jurnal Arsitektur Tropis, 6(1), 55–64.

El Sarraf, M., Tabbara, M., & Abou-Jaoude, G. (2017). Fire resistance of weathering steel. Engineering Structures, 135, 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.12.032

Fletcher, T. D., Andrieu, H., & Hamel, P. (2015). Understanding, management and modelling of urban hydrology and its consequences for receiving waters: A state of the art. Advances in Water Resources, 51, 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.09.001

GBCI (Green Building Council Indonesia). (2022). Greenship rating tools. https://www.gbcindonesia.org/greenship

Haynes, K., Barclay, J., & Pidgeon, N. (2008). The issue of trust and its influence on risk communication during a volcanic crisis. Bulletin of Volcanology, 70(5), 605–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-007-0156-z

Hyde, R. (2000). Climate responsive design: A study of buildings in moderate and hot humid climates. E & FN Spon.

Karyono, T. H. (2010). Arsitektur hijau (green architecture) di Indonesia: Tinjauan konsep dan implementasinya. Dimensi Interior, 8(2), 91–97.

Kibert, C. J. (2016). Sustainable construction: Green building design and delivery (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Marfai, M. A., King, L., Sartohadi, J., & Kaswanto, R. L. (2015). Coastal hazard assessment and risk management in Semarang, Indonesia. Environmental Geology, 54(6), 1235–1245.

Olgyay, V. (2015). Design with climate: Bioclimatic approach to architectural regionalism. Princeton University Press.

Shaw, R., Pulhin, J. M., & Pereira, J. J. (Eds.). (2012). Climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction: Issues and challenges. Emerald Group Publishing.

Steinfeld, E., & Maisel, J. (2012). Universal design: Creating inclusive environments. John Wiley & Sons.

Suzuki, T., Shibayama, T., & Imamura, F. (2018). Disaster education in school: Basic understanding and curriculum development. Journal of Disaster Research, 13(5), 921–928.

Szokolay, S. V. (2008). Introduction to architectural science: The basis of sustainable design (2nd ed.). Architectural Press.

Tanaka, K. (2005). The impact of disaster education on public awareness: A case study from Japan. Global Environmental Research, 9(2), 181–190.

Tolédano, D. (2011). Design of steel structures under fire conditions. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 67(1), 1–9.

UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). (2019). Energy efficiency for buildings: Progress and opportunities. https://www.unep.org

World Risk Report. (2021). World Risk Report 2021: Focus – Social protection. Bündnis Entwicklung Hilft & Ruhr University Bochum.

Yuliani, D., & Ardiansyah, M. (2020). Partisipasi masyarakat dalam penanggulangan bencana berbasis lokal. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 23(3), 258–273.

Zubaidi, Z., Rahmayani, R., & Ramadhani, T. (2023). Strategi desain fasad Sequis Tower dalam penerapan green building. Jurnal Arsitektur Modern Tropis, 11(1), 33–42.