Evaluasi Ekonomi dan Transparansi Kontrak Gross Split dan Cost Recovery dalam Pengelolaan Hulu Migas di Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/konstruksi.v3i1.696Keywords:
Transparency, Cost Recovery, Gross SplitAbstract
Transparency in the management of upstream oil and gas contracts in Indonesia is crucial to ensure the efficient and accountable management of natural resources. The two main contract schemes applied, Cost Recovery and Gross Split, each face challenges related to transparency. In the Cost Recovery scheme, transparency issues are related to the verification of costs submitted by contractors, while in the Gross Split scheme, transparency is needed in determining objective production-sharing parameters. Digital technology emerges as a solution to improve accountability, but its implementation requires strong regulatory support and infrastructure investment. The principle of good faith between the government and contractors is also a key factor in achieving effective transparency. Strengthening the capacity of SKK Migas as the regulatory body and ensuring information openness to the public are essential to building trust and creating sustainable management.
References
Adji, A. N. S., Irham, M. T., D. I. S., & Yulia, S. T., M. T., P. S. (2023). Evaluasi perbandingan keekonomian 30 sumur skema PSC cost recovery dan gross split lapangan A. PETRO: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Perminyakan, 11(4), 191–195. https://doi.org/10.25105/petro.v11i4.14391
Al-Islami, A. (2015). Legalitas kontrak kerjasama minyak dan gas bumi pada organisasi dan tata kerja satuan kerja khusus pelaksana kegiatan usaha hulu minyak dan gas bumi. EKP, 13(3), 1576–1580.
Ariyon, M., & Dewi, E. K. (2018). Studi perbandingan keekonomian pengembangan lapangan minyak marjinal menggunakan production sharing contract dan gross split. In Seminar Nasional Teknologi Dan Rekayasa (pp. 23–29).
Floriantina, E. (2021). Perbandingan antara production sharing contract cost recovery dan gross split dalam usaha hulu minyak dan gas bumi di Indonesia. Jurnal Privat Law, 9, 10–18.
Hartanto, R. S. W., & Dani, H. (2016). Studi literatur: Pengembangan media pembelajaran dengan software AutoCAD. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Teknik Bangunan, 1(1), 1–6.
Jumiati, W., & Sismartono, D. (2018). Tantangan keekonomian kontrak bagi hasil gross split dan cost recovery: Studi kasus lapangan gas offshore di Sumatera bagian utara. Lembaran Publikasi Minyak dan Gas Bumi, 52(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.29017/lpmgb.52.2.350
Kastella, N., & Prabowo, H. Y. (2020). Mekanisme transparansi dan akuntabilitas atas cost recovery berdasarkan production sharing contract minyak dan gas bumi dari kontraktor KKS ke pemerintah melalui SKK Migas. Siklus Tujuh Tahunan Ekonomi Indonesia, 23(1), 1–20.
Shobah, S., Widhiyanti, H. N., & Audrey, P. (2013). Cost recovery dalam kontrak kerjasama minyak dan gas bumi di Indonesia ditinjau dari hukum kontrak internasional. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699. http://prokum.esdm.go.id/Publikasi/Hasil Kajian/ESDM Analis.pdf
Sundari, A., & Muryanto, Y. T. (2020). Penerapan asas itikad baik terhadap kontrak bagi hasil dengan sistem cost recovery dan gross split. Jurnal Privat Law, 8(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v8i1.40366
Tambunan, M. R. U. D., & Togatorop, G. (2021). Dualisme ketentuan cost recovery sebagai dasar pungutan negara pada industri hulu migas. Veritas et Justitia, 7(1), 56–90. https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.v7i1.3740
Wijaya, R. O. (2016). Analisis keekonomian dan perbandingan model kontrak production sharing contract cost recovery dan production sharing contract gross split pada lapangan Jayy. 1–23.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Konstruksi: Publikasi Ilmu Teknik, Perencanaan Tata Ruang dan Teknik Sipil
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.